In April I commented on a ruling of the British High Court, which put on hold an application by Owen and Eunice Johns to foster a child because the couple had indicated they would not be able to promote the homosexual lifestyle of a child in their care.
The September issue of the Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship Newsletter points out that counsel for the couple made sweeping statements not backed up by evidence, and it seems the couple could in fact have gone to other agencies where their attitude to homosexuality would not have been an impediment to being a foster carer.
The newsletter also contrasts the case with a similar case involving a homosexual couple looking to become foster carers, who took Sydney’s Wesley Mission to the Anti-Discrimination Board, a dispute eventually resolved in favour of Wesley Mission. That couple also had other agencies they could have turned to.
What a tragedy when the needs and rights of children are overlooked to advance a political agenda.
Broadcast on 2CH Sydney, Sunday 25 september 2011.




